Should Donald Trump fail a second time to be re-elected he faces the very real possibility of jail time and massive financial penalties due to the sheer volume of criminal cases and civil lawsuits that are on hold until after the election.

That is the opinion of Syracuse University law professor Greg Germain who explained in an interview with Newsweek that the former president’s only path to get out from under the federal cases he now faces is to beat Vice President Kamala Harris in less than two weeks and then push the Department of Justice to drop the cases filed against him.

As Germain stated, the multiple federal cases Trump is facing are solid and his only path to victory may be having them shut down.

Newsweek source: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-legal-cases-georgia-washington-florida-new-york-stormy-daniels-chutkan-cannon-1974406

  • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The public electing representatives who make these rules is one thing. Courts undermining elections arbitrarily is entirely another.

    The public needs to decide whether they want Trump to be held accountable for his crimes.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Arbitrarily? They have pretty good indications that trump has committed multiple crimes.

      The public should not be the ones who decide if someone is accountable. This is not a direct democracy. (Hardly a democracy at all)

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree that the public doesn’t have adequate skills, experience, or knowledge to determine whether someone should be held accountable.

        I also agree that Trump has undoubtedly committed multiple crimes and deserves to be penalised, probably by being incarcerated.

        The problem is that the electoral college is likely to have sufficient votes to elect him regardless.

        The core problem is that courts shouldn’t influence elections. It seems like a great idea now because the “baddies” will be on the pointy end of that stick, but undoubtedly it would be turned against us later on.