• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s disturbing how much the global economy depends on us buying shit we don’t need.

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      I guess if we as humanity focused on producing only high quality and essential, basic products (food, housing, clothing) + the tools and processes that we need in the supply chain, we could massively reduce labor and reduce our ecological footprint at the same time. But our current economical system is depending on everyone doing something, everlasting growth and consumption.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I tend to run vehicles until they die as well, but that’s mostly because kayaks and mountain bikes are far more interesting.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Disgusting title, ofc the economy (specific sector) “crashes” (=“growth diminishes”, still as profitable as before) when post-scarcity is achieved, but only financially speaking.

    Also production at a level where there is enough of something for everyone was the goal (right???), be happy when it’s achieved, dont listen to the propaganda of the few who profited in the process.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah. That was the goal. Totally! Definitely wasn’t to maximize profits for the 1% and consolidate societal control. Don’t even give that a second thought. Now if I’m not mistaken someone’s burgers need flipping.