Fun fact: the fucking loser that made this got bullied so hard he deleted everything related to this off his social media accounts.

Also I agree with the fella that says we need to being back tarring and feathering, exclusively for techbros

Article source: https://www.thewrap.com/ai-princess-mononoke-remake-trailer-slammed-online/

“I strongly feel that [artificial intelligence] is an insult to life itself,” the original’s legendary animator Hayao Miyazaki has previously said

A “Princess Mononoke” film created using so-called generative AI was slammed by fans on social media after its release earlier this week.

“One day we’ll wake up, and there won’t be any more Princess Mononoke, Gravity Falls, Avatar or animated films like Wolf Children or Arcane… just AI-generated soulless garbage,” wrote @goroweko on X, formerly Twitter. “I don’t want that so bad.”

The AI-generated remake goes up against the original “shot-for-shot” and was created by AI entrepreneur PJ Acetturo, combining AI-generated CGI shots that match the fim. The result is a “crime” that turns “a 15-year-old Japanese girl into a white woman with a smoky eye and bikini tan lines” and “‘is enough for me to think we should bring back tarring and feathering,” literary agent Roma Panganiban wrote on X.

Acetturo has made it clear he’s proud of his production, no matter what reaction it’s received. “I’ve wanted to make a live action version of Studio Ghibli’s Princess Mononoke for 20+ years now. I spent $745 in Kling credits to show you a glimpse of the future of filmmaking,” he wrote on X.

The AI filmmaker added that he was “being interviewed on the BBC today about my films” and “Clients are reaching out like crazy.”

He was challenged in the BBC segment, with one of the British network’s contributors noting that it seemed that there was something lacking in AI-created content.

“I’m sure there will be some criticism of this. I’ve heard Miyazaki is anti-AI. That’s okay,” the filmmaker wrote online. “I made this adaptation mostly for myself, because his work makes me want to create new worlds. We should look for ethical ways to explore AI tools to help empower artists to create.”

He posted a side-by-side comparison of his trailer with the beautifully crafted original:

The Mononoke trailer is a shot-for-shot remake of the trailer. This film has been in my head for two decades. I love this world so much.

I hope this meager adaptation inspires others to further explore their favorite worlds. Here’s the side by side comparison: pic.twitter.com/eDu8ASOBU6

— PJ Ace (@PJaccetturo) October 3, 2024 His statements were called out as problematic by actor Swann Grey, who tweeted in response, “‘I’ve heard Miyazaki is anti-AI. That’s okay.’ … Excuse you? To say that in the same breath as the word ‘ethical’? And to call a shot-for-shot remake ‘creating a new world’? Zero creativity, zero respect, and zero concept of what art is. You’re not an artist — you’re a fraud.”

Miyazaki himself has stated, when presented with an example of the use of AI in animation, that “I strongly feel that this is an insult to life itself.”

  • Omashkooz [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been one of the loudest critics of the planet-burning proliferation of treat printers and I personally am fine with PC-scale LLM applications like that.

    oof how embarassing, you just told on yourself for being one of the loudest speakers and without investigation

    it’s only the training that is energy-intensive, running the LLM can be done locally

    what you’re saying is like “I’m cool with people cycling bicycles; I oppose bicycles being built because it’s too energy-intensive”

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What?

      I just said that PC-scale energy expenditure is acceptable to me. What damage was already done has been done, but that is not a blank check for infinite further damage, not at the scale that Eric Schmidt proposes, or that you probably also propose considering that you think it’s a gotcha to dislike even the damage done so far.

      https://xcancel.com/tsarnick/status/1842401670225125539

      it’s only the training that is energy-intensive

      Yes, and just because so much has already been done doesn’t mean that greenlighting a massive expansion of further training (or the data centers being built for that purpose) is necessary, good, or even wise under many non-essential circumstances considering the current energy and climate crisis.

      oof how embarassing

      jagoff Fuck off with the Reddit-style smug and smarmy passive-aggressive posturing.

      Also, fuck off with your site vocabulary cherry picking, you very brave 5-day-old alt account.