• severien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, that doesn’t make a lot of sense. Russia has enough boats/ships to evacuate Crimea if they wanted. They used to supply the whole Crimea woth ships before the bridge was built.

    If Ukraine could, they would definitely destroy the bridge. But it’s just very difficult task.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Putin would forbid any evacuation plans. A bridge allows scared soldiers a way to run away without permission from command.

      • severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        WTF, the bridge has checkpoints on both sides, you’re not going to somehow sneak thousands of soldiers.

          • severien@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You think they would mutiny? Then they can just steal some of the many ships in the harbors.

            And again, 20 km long bridge is a perfect place to destroy / stop whatever you want. It’s a chokepoint, hell to get through if the other sode doesn’t want to let you go through.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are assuming that the Russian government values the lives of their soldiers more than the strategic and economic benefit of holding Crimea. I think they’d rather hold Crimea at all costs.

      And if they have to lose their Crimean dream, I’m sure they’d rather it happen after a Stalingrad-esque situation, where literally everyone fights to the very, very, very last, instead of the ignominy of their troops retreating from those lovely warm water ports.