Now currently I’m not in the workforce, but in the past from my work experience, apprenticeship and temp roles, I’ve always seen ipv4 and not ipv6!

Hell, my ISP seems to exclusively use ipv4 (unless behind nats they’re using ipv6)

Do you think a lot of people stick with the earlier iteration because they have been so familiar with it for a long time?

When you look at a ipv6, it looks menacing with a long string of letters and numbers compared to the more simpler often.

I am aware the IP bucket has gone dry and they gotta bring in a new IP cow with a even bigger bucket, but what do you think? Do you yourself or your firm use ipv4 or 6?

  • WheelchairArtist@lemmy.world
    71·
    2 个月前

    IPv6 addressed the necessity of NAT by adding an obscene amount of possible IPs

    that is correct but doesn’t change the fact that nat came afterwards as a workaround und now the ip stack goes back to it’s roots without a nat workaround.

    It didn’t start actually being seriously used until ~2006/7ish.

    true but still nowadays it isn’t even slow anymore just refusal

    • Sundial@lemm.ee
      42·
      2 个月前

      that is correct but doesn’t change the fact that nat came afterwards as a workaround und now the ip stack goes back to it’s roots without a nat workaround.

      And the end result is a simplification for routing.

      true but still nowadays it isn’t even slow anymore just refusal

      That’s just the pace of large scale adoption of new technology. Look at some of the technologies the banking and financial industry uses as an example (ISO 8583 is a great example). ISP’s still support T1 circuits as well.