• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    This isn’t a rule. Some bureaucrat was mistaken.

    The same thing happened to another girl a couple weeks ago.

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        The French do their arguably dumber “you can’t call that thing you made what I call it even though it’s the same recipe, because it wasn’t grown where my ancient relatives made it,” though. Also France’s general xenophobia and owning a bona fide colony way later than the Anglos lol

        • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re talking about AOP (Appelation d’Origine Protégée / Protected Origin Naming). It makes senses because protected names are place names. You can’t call any sparkling wine “champagne”. It has to come from Champagne. However, you can call your raw milk cheese “faisselle” even if it wasn’t made in Rians, as faisselle isn’t a place.

          • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            By that logic, you should object to cheese being labelled as “cheddar” cheese, because that’s a place too and you’ve almost certainly never seen cheese which came from there.

            It’s a stupid rule

            • Squizzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I wouldnt see it as stupid, people and governments want to protect what they produce.

              If it doesnt matter then have prosecco and everyone is happy.