https://futurism.com/the-byte/government-ai-worse-summarizing

The upshot: these AI summaries were so bad that the assessors agreed that using them could require more work down the line, because of the amount of fact-checking they require. If that’s the case, then the purported upsides of using the technology — cost-cutting and time-saving — are seriously called into question.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    You keep bringing up stuff I didn’t even mention. It’s super annoying.

    How do you think I feel when you keep conjuring up a pile of straw labeled “frightened superstitious Luddite who fears for their immortal soul” and smugposting toward it?

    It’s like you’re arguing against a character in your head.

    I don’t really wish to continue this conversation.

    Then don’t. There’s plenty of subreddits such as /r/singularity and /r/futurology that will cheerfully agree with all of your internalized marketing beliefs.

    But hey, actually. I apologize for my tone earlier

    Then why did you use the same fucking tone in this post?

    If you want to stop, just stop. If you want to fling more “respectful” insults my way, I can’t stop you.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        Okay, sure. Like this?

        Honestly, I could have used nicer words. I just realized maybe I was subconsciously kinda picking on you with my brusque language earlier because you’re so abrasive.

        Yeah, it’s not working. You never stopped doing it and you’re trying to blame it on me.

        Believe whatever you want to believe about marketing hype calling large language models “AI” as it has for the last few years, no matter the blurring effect that that sloppy hype branding has already done to actual artificial intelligence research.

        I’m done.