Remember when we were told that privatisation of power generation would lower prices?

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Floating solar sounds like a bit of a gimmick to me, I suspect if it was as easy as the people promoting it make out, it would already be everywhere.

    It also doesn’t help that our hydro is mostly at the other end of the country to where all the sun is.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is a bunch of hydro along the Waikato. Lakes are huge.

      Current most efficient panels are 750W giving an power density of ~350W/m2. With all of the gaps and extras you can probably get a system density of around 250W/m2.

      Using this assumption, we are looking at 1MW/acre.

      Floating 10 acres of panels (or using the nearby river bank) would supplement 10MW of generation during the day, reducing the draw down on the lake level. Do this at the 9 dams along the Waikato that is another easy 90MW without major infrastructure costs.

      The capital outlay is also very small, compared to trying to get another 90MW plant built and commissioned somewhere.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The capital outlay may be small, but the ongoing maintenance on a floating structure like that would be quite high, certainly compared to a fixed installation.

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe, it is not like the ocean. The lakes don’t have big waves to deal with etc…

          The benefit is that there are not any trees and plant growing above where you want your panels.