• Nocturne Dragonite@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Naw people have said “it’s easily interpreted” and “I don’t see how people don’t see it’s backhanded” and y’all keep implying she said he wasn’t attractive, fuck are you on?

    • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      We do not imply this, it has been explained several times already. You’d just rather be obtuse and feel superior instead of engage with an argument that has been presented several times already.

      • Nocturne Dragonite@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’d just rather be obtuse and feel superior instead of engage with an argument that has been presented several times already.

        I’m engaging, she is being LITERAL, so keep repeating yourself.

        • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          she is being LITERAL.

          And you are literally adding to what is said, which is what you keep pretending not to understand.

          so keep repeating yourself.

          I have to repeat myself because you can’t get the simple concept of “when you’re referring to what was said, refer to that instead of what you’d like it to be” thru your thick skull