jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 7 个月前Lawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1262arrow-down19
arrow-up1253arrow-down1external-linkLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 7 个月前message-square118fedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·7 个月前But he’s not charged with a crime and will never be in relation to this tragic accident.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down11·edit-27 个月前Doesn’t matter. Again, the fact of one’s guilt is immaterial to another’s knowledge of that guilt. One had always been guilty and only found as such by the court. One is not factually innocent, and then suddenly factually guilty. It is a mere presumption.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·7 个月前So why hasn’t he been convicted of a crime? Seems the law doesn’t find him guilty of anything.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·7 个月前Because the prosecution fucked up the legal process.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 个月前But he’s not guilty, right?
But he’s not charged with a crime and will never be in relation to this tragic accident.
Doesn’t matter.
Again, the fact of one’s guilt is immaterial to another’s knowledge of that guilt. One had always been guilty and only found as such by the court.
One is not factually innocent, and then suddenly factually guilty. It is a mere presumption.
So why hasn’t he been convicted of a crime?
Seems the law doesn’t find him guilty of anything.
Because the prosecution fucked up the legal process.
But he’s not guilty, right?