• Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Already in the comment, click the links.

      https://www.safekidsinc.com/hero-program-overview

      Here’s where it goes through their curriculum per grade level including pre schoolers.

      The 'heroes" program is not teaching pre schoolers to use guns, it’s teaching them about active shooter situations.

      The other link was the one offering actual gun training (for 7 year olds and up so second graders potentially).

      My comment was that it’s sad we apparently need programs to to teach pre schoolers about how to deal with active shooting situations now.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t see the problem with teaching 7 year olds firearm safety. You’re throwing your credibility out the window by including that.

        Beyond that though, it is sad, but it isn’t a gun problem. Yes, getting rid of guns would get rid of most shootings. However, it wouldn’t deal with the underlying problems causing these incidents, and it wouldn’t help the vast majority of violence in schools. Also, most school shootings, contrary to popular belief, are one or two people, not mass shootings. When our schools are a home to bullies, sexually abusive staff, racially segregated districts (yes, in the 21st century), economically segregated districts, republican defunding efforts, a loss of teachers especially during and immediately post-pandemic, and racially based gangs that perform regular violence against each other, it comes as no surprise, at least to me, that this violence is occurring. If it wasn’t a gun, it would be another weapon. We need to focus on the actual problems, not the ones that make us sad and grab our attention, especially when disarming the populace gives our already authoritarian police state even more power.