*Forgive any formatting as I’m on mobile.

As I read in themes, I’m currently focusing on philosophy to try and understand it, see where I fit in the world and also reconstruct my own atheist/nihilistic worldview.

I just got done with Existentialist Cafe and got a really nice overview of all the main players in the Existentialist camp but want to finally take the leap into nihilism and absurdism proper. I’ve read The Stranger and Myth of Sisyphus and like Camus a lot so far but also wanna tackle Satre, Beauvoir, and Merleau-Ponty eventually but wonder if I need to read Husserl and specifically Heidegger and Nietzche since they are controversial because of their politics. Would I be able to get away with just reading synopses of their work? I do currently have Being and Time in my list of books to get.

Also, aside from Nietzche, who else should I read regarding nihilism? I’m currently working through The Trouble with Being Born by Cioran and wanna find some more by him but also have The Antidote by Burkeman and Conspiracy Against the Human Race by Ligotti in my backlog. I did read The Book by Alan Watts the other day and though it felt like reading my stoned friend’s wild ramblings on society and how we exist in it, some coherent stuff did come through. But I don’t know if it was what I was after. I did appreciate it for introducing me to some concepts like ego and self but maybe I should have saved it for another day?

Sidenote but I’m planning on moving back and force between philosophy and socialist theory so socialist philosphers are also welcome. Generally I’m open to all suggestions.

Thanks in advance!

  • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
    4·
    5 months ago

    Gonna look for Losurdo and Lukacs. Different sources site Camus as a nihilist and an absurdist. Though I think he disregarded himself as neither even though he wrote the Absurd trilogy(Sisyphus etc).

    I don’t think I care about someone that thinks that a group of people should rule over another group just because they are strong and that’s one of my uneducated takeaways about Nietzche so far. But then again that was Beauvoir’s whole angle for The Second Sex(also in my list) and she flipped the master/slave concept on its head, or so that is my understanding.

    • QueerCommie [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.netEnglish
      3·
      5 months ago

      I prefer absurdist, but maybe that’s just because I like to not cite Heidegger when talking about his one idea (how insane anything exists at all).

      I like to imagine Marxism makes everyone an ubermensch allowing all to live well and whatever, but he probably meant it “I’m better than these losers and want to rule over them.”

    • scarcity_of_the_self [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
      2·
      1 month ago

      You want The Destruction of Reason, by Georg Lukács, and Western Marxism: How It Was Born, How It Died, How It Might Be Reborn by Domenico Losurdo.

      Also literally just go on Critical Theory Workshop youtube and look up Gabriel Rockhill’s lectures about this, they are incredibly good.

      He goes through not just how Heidegger and Nietzsche’s Naziism was covered up but also how the intellectual apparatus of the west originated in funding from the NATO spy organization the Information Research Department

      The books themselves have a bit more about disentangling Heidegger and Nietzsche’s word games from their historical context, influences, and their descendants