• mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wait digital signature is not easy on linux? What kind of digital signing is this? I thought it was possible with GPG and also with gui apps. Maybe I’m thinking about some other digital signing??

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      PDFs have embedded digital signatures, so the signing tool needs to support the proprietary format.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If it was valid, do you really think people would be talking about it being a problem here? Please use your head a little.

          Also, two entitely different meanings of the word signing being used here. Signing as in signing a bill vs. Cryptographic signing. Adobe has some weird “halfway” thing that’s more than painting the sig on the image, but isn’t gpg.

          Hooray for proprietary shit becoming accepted for legal use! Yuck.

          • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            When I worked with a lot of legal documents, we just used DocuSign mostly. Have you attempted that on Linux? Not sure what it’s like these days, also curious if it’s because it’s a web application if it works the same.

        • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well, it uses existing PKI/CAs (ie, same as your browser), which I’m not sure GPG supports? I might be wrong.

          You could certainly use GPG, but it’s not what others will be looking for. Depends on your use case, I guess.