people have been demonizing it for most of the AD years i think but it’s quite pleasant really. are there any proven negative effects?

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    She was and she says it in both that and other wrirings and publically.

    “Male sexuality, drunk on its intrinsic contempt for all life, but especially for women’s lives, can run wild.”

    “Hatred of women is a source of sexual pleasure for men in its own right.”

    She argued that penetration was a form of “occupation”.

    “intercourse remains a means or the means of physiologically making a woman inferior”

    She labeled women that had sexual with men “collaborators”.

    But defenders like you will split hairs to make it seem like her demonization of male sexuality is just made up by her critics.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      But defenders like you

      Lol, I literally have never heard of the lady until this thread, but sure it’s me with an agenda.

      With better reading comprehension instead of “man get real angry when word men used to describe things men do generally” even those quotes aren’t saying what you think they’re saying…and that’s with no attribution or sources so I don’t even know if they’re misquotes.

      EDIT: Also you sidestepped your completely invalid claim that marital rape was illegal always because you argue in bad faith