• Kachilde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Financially incentivised”? As in, the people who make a living creating original art? The people whose work is being taken without compensation and fed into a mindless program to plagiarise their work? Those bastards?

    Artists aren’t some rich elite that you are winning one over on here. They are individuals who have been told for years that ‘exposure’ is the best payment. They are people, not companies. They have worked hard to develop their skills.

    Their ‘financial incentive’ is wanting to be paid for their hard work? Fuck those guys right?

      • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        ai will not help real artists except for perhaps generating references. calculators are of great use to mathematicians because they are tools that do not steal their jobs, but instead make said jobs easier.

      • djnattyp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Calculator: 2+2=4

        AI: 2+2={4,5,13,52,…}

        AI techbros: Wassa problem? It’s givin u an answer, innit? Just as good as a calculaduh.

    • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      But its not plagiarism. Its just training. In terms of information its no different from a human just seeing an art piece.

      • Kachilde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        But they don’t learn when you train them. They mashup what they have been fed, and shit out an approximation of your request each time. When you type “in the style of xyz”, the system doesn’t remember who xyz is. It does a search for data on xyz, and copies it.

        If these models were learning, you wouldn’t still need paragraph long prompts every time you wanted to plop out another plastic-skinned anime chick with fucked-up flipper hands and huge bazoongas. It would have learned how to make that shit by now.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          the system doesn’t remember who xyz is. It does a search for data on xyz, and copies it

          This sentence is so not how those AI models work, that it leads me to believe you don’t actually know enough about them to be having this discussion.

        • Hackworth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Honestly, I’m having a ton of fun with generative A.I. as a marketing producer. It’s allowing me to play in new ways and realize ideas that I would have never had the time or resources to execute otherwise. It’s given me the confidence to explore entirely new mediums and workflows that have bled over into my personal art.

      • kshade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s like a cover band trying to replace the real deal by writing “original” songs that are suspiciously derivative.