Support my legal and personal GoFundMe:🔗https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-dave-mcbride-fight-for-justice-for-afghanistaContact:🌏davidmcbride.com.au✉ contact@...

(Not me) Official video from David McBride’s Official Youtube channel. If you don’t know who he is - I don’t blame you, with how little coverage this story has gotten

    • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneOPEnglish
      16·
      7 months ago

      Riddle me this then: Why would he hand evidence of war crimes being committed to a journalist if HE wanted people to know that soldiers weren’t committing war crimes?

      That Four Corners episode came out fairly recently. Tell me, what motives would Dan Oakes, an investigative journalist with a reputation, have to disparage a whistleblower who is about to be prosecuted? I dunno, maybe he doesn’t want to be the target of prosecution himself and distancing from him is protection?

      Why do you keep referring to the BBC article? It’s quite poorly worded and oversimplified for an international audience. You won’t find many articles about David McBride’s motives from before the case because he was secret then, the ABC gave him up.

        • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneOPEnglish
          12·
          7 months ago

          So it’s either A:

          • David McBride is an idiot who misinterpreted what was happening as a defence lawyer investigating war crimes
          • War crimes happened
          • Commanders and Politicians aren’t smart enough to cover up war crimes committed by PR exercises like Ben Roberts-Smith by investigating otherwise innocent soldiers

          Or B:

          • David McBride is not an idiot
          • War crimes happened
          • Commanders and Politicians are smart enough to attempt to cover up war crimes committed by the likes of Ben Roberts-Smith (Australia’s most decorated soldier, was used to ‘sell’ the war to Australians).

          I choose B, but hey, you know better because of some random BBC article and an ABC hit piece