CriticalOtaku [he/him]@hexbear.net to games@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agoAnita Sarkeesian is shutting down Feminist Frequency after 15 yearswww.polygon.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkAnita Sarkeesian is shutting down Feminist Frequency after 15 yearswww.polygon.comCriticalOtaku [he/him]@hexbear.net to games@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square38fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarePluto [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoProblem is: she wasn’t exactly good herself… but her comments were tame beyond measure. They were tame and people still beat her up for them. And it spawned a lot of ultra-right and alt-right people too.
minus-squareVladimir_Slipknotchenko [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years ago Problem is: she wasn’t exactly good herself I know nothing other than her making losers mad. Explain please?
minus-squareUlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoIt was mostly technical tier pedantic stuff, like how actually killing the dominatrix nuns in the Hitman game wasn’t actually rewarded by the mission design therefore everything else she said objectively wrong
Problem is: she wasn’t exactly good herself… but her comments were tame beyond measure.
They were tame and people still beat her up for them.
And it spawned a lot of ultra-right and alt-right people too.
I know nothing other than her making losers mad. Explain please?
It was mostly technical
tier pedantic stuff, like how actually killing the dominatrix nuns in the Hitman game wasn’t actually rewarded by the mission design therefore everything else she said objectively wrong 