@[email protected] @[email protected] Lol, you do realize that podcast has telltale artifacts of one of the most popular voice alteration apps, right? You can hear the squeaking. Most people who do that just have an excuse that they’re using one because they know people are looking for it. I’ve already run into people doing this level of sock puppetry before. Check out “Subliminal Jihad” and “Programmed to Chill”, most of it is the same guy. Not surprising you immediately use the identity of your alts as a parry, that’s no doubt the reason you created these “party members”.

Anyways, whether you’re alts or not, and I think you are, this is just as embarrassing to have the whole gang show up on the site to defend him and try to use the gender identity (I didn’t even check) of one of the suspicious accounts in question as a shield. My point was the interactions of “Ali Circe” and “Nia Frome” have practically no function other than to promote RedSails. (Very far from what online friendships entail! Well above codependent besties. I have accounts where I’m in a gaggle of furries and it’s nowhere near as intense. Mike Judge of Death/Corner was less enthusiastic about retweeting the namesake pod of ‘chapo.chat’ (which we are on) when he was popping painkillers.) Like I said, self-promotion is a motivation to people even in the absence of a direct financial opportunity, and there is one in the form of donations & sales of materials. Same reason everyone is suspicious of anonymous edits to personal wikipedia pages and they’re immediately rolled back by bots 90% of the time. There’s just no reason to make it that easy for people.

As for the rest of my critique of the approach being taken to Hudson’s work in Roderic’s posts, nobody even approached that. It was just immediate attacks and attempts to control the discussion. I think that speaks for itself. You’re not even confident in what was said. @[email protected] if you want to turn this into some kind of “debate” I’d start there. All of this online behavior is used to substitute for real work.

All I got in response was “he’s tweeting lots about Hudson, I’m sure he made better arguments there” (he didn’t, it’s very surface level engagement with his work, fuming at the vlog is the most embarrassing part to me though). Roderic makes numerous claims about the content of Hudson’s work which strike me as hilarious having actually read it.

Saying something reminds you of another argument by Proudhon or Bakunin or what have you is just ridiculous especially considering the guy’s gone into depth about what quirky ancient economists he truly does dig. The man is a Marxist he just happens to go on a lot of I Fucking Love Science pods.

I’m not done with my 🚔🚨👨‍⚕️psychological profiling either I think an RTS player turning to a swarm and control strategy makes perfect sense. It’s not really a concern to me though, ultimately people’s arguments stand up or they don’t. People who throw a lot of ultraliberal jibber jabber into the discourse don’t accomplish anything no matter how many accounts it’s spread across. Like the raddle and the lemmy.world moderators upvoting themselves with bots, the only people who care about that kind of stuff aren’t predisposed towards any theory related to taking action on the ground anyways. Some of the stuff on RedSails that’s been reposted is cute, but all of the original writing on it restates the obvious. I checked it out originally for the Xinjiang genocide debunking, but that really doesn’t take any grasp of historical materialism to refute.

For the most part original articles consist of inane historical references which Stalin would have laughed at.

Redsails is very similar to Caleb Maupin’s webpage for CPI where he reposts a bunch of marxists.org stuff but for a more highbrow audience. 😁