My PC is getting on a little, it’s running on an i7-4790k, 16gb ddr4, and a GTX 970. right now, it’s struggling some in most games even though I don’t play any triple A titles. What would be a sensible upgrade that wouldn’t get totally bottlenecked by the CPU?

In most games I’m playing the CPU is pinned at around 25% while my card is maxed at 100% 3d and vmem usage so I’m fairly sure it’s just my card that’s the main limiting factor.

  • atocci@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Maybe a GTX 1660-Ti if you can find one for a good price?

    Edit: An Intel Arc A750 might be the better value if you’re buying new, though

    • Mesophar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Or even see if you can find an RX 6600. Around US$200 right now, and should give decent performance without being horribly bottlenecked

      • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Can confirm. Had the same CPU, and a rx6600 without xt. Cyberpunk ran at 50 FPS in high details. At 1080p.

        Great value card for this processor.

      • NaClKnight@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah i agree with this.

        The RX 6600 is the best ultra budget (under $200) upgrade, though the RX 6650 XT and RX 7600 project to last longer as viable upgrades and are still under $250.

        The 6600 is slightly weaker than the 5700 XT which is still a valid card today

    • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In that same vein; a 2060 super was what I recently upgraded an older ryzen system with. Completely worth it considering I got it for $140.

  • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You are me 1 year ago.

    I have a 4790k w/16GB ddr 4 and I upgraded from a GTX 970 to a RTX3060 and had a lot of luck.

    Something in that range would probably work well.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So I thought about that, which was why I got it actually. An upgrade for that PC that would be a good stopgap on my next.

        I just ended up giving that PC to my son and building a new one entirely, bought another 3060 for it as a good stopgap LOL

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t worry about getting bottlenecked by the CPU. If you’re using maximum capacity, you’ll always be bottlenecked by something.

    • DrownedRats@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Not that I’m worried at all, I understand you’ll never get anything perfectly balanced. I’m more concerned by trying to closely match price and performance. I could buy a top of the range graphics card for £800 but it won’t even sweat at the CPU desperately trying to keep up. I’d rather buy a cheaper card that’s going to let me stretch my CPU without breaking the bank

      I know I can get a better card that will let me better utilise my CPU and that my card is what’s limiting me right now so as long as I can bridge that gap as best I can I’d be very happy

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wouldn’t worry too much about going overkill on the GPU. You could go for a $200-400 GPU and be in a great place for when you decide to upgrade the CPU. I wouldn’t go crazy and get something like a 4090, though.

  • Lemmenmo@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If you’re looking second hand :
    Nvidia: 2060 or better
    AMD : 6600xt or better.

    I wouldn’t bother with older generations at this point, I’d also be a touch hesitant to go with much newer, unless you’re willing to bring the GPU forward to your next build.

    • DavLemmyHav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Had a 2060 and 4790k, ran most games fine, and only in cyberpunk was i stuck with 40fps because of the cpu. Otherwise its a good combo

  • delitomatoes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    In terms of value for money try last gen AMD, I have a 6700xt and it runs well on my 6 year old system. My bottleneck is mostly CPU now until I upgrade

  • NaClKnight@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Do you have an upgrade budget?
    With a 4790k You’re looking at PCIe 3.0,

    a Radeon RX 6600, 6650 XT, or 7600 are all good 8GB VRAM cards for under $250 that will last for a long time at 1080p.

    VRAM concerns really only occur at higher resolutions, so for you any modern card (2022 or newer) will be a massive upgrade. The 6600 can be had for $180 these days

    But even you’re not planning to upgrade CPU right now, i would just buy the best GPU you can fit in your budget, and do worry about bottlenecks. One day you’ll upgrade CPU/MB/RAM and the GPU will fit right in.