- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
tl;dr:
- Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 SoC, 4-core CPU clocked at 1.7 Ghz, Adreno 702 GPU, more power-efficient than the previous SoC (Exynos 9110);
- Google is not using the W5+ variant, which adds the QCC5100 coprocessor, it will be using a custom coprocessor instead similar to 1st gen Pixel Watch;
- NXP SR100T UWB module (https://www.androidauthority.com/what-is-uwb-1151744/);
- 306mAh battery (vs 294mAh in 1st gen);
- Samsung Display instead of Pixel Watch’s BOE panel, specs remain the same;
- Wear OS 4 (based on Android 13) and seamless updates (https://source.android.com/docs/core/ota/ab);
It’s amazing that, after nearly a decade of development, WearOS watches still barely eek out a day of use - and that’s only if you don’t use most of the advertised features. God forbid you use sleep tracking and track a workout in the same day, because you’ll be charging 2-3 times that day.
Is it the OS? Or is it something else? I’ve got a Garmin and I don’t have all the sensors on all the time, but I do have most of them on. The biggest thing is that GPS isn’t always on. I get 1+ week of battery life.
With the Google watch, is GPS always on?
Galaxy Watch 5 44mm here with all the features enabled but raise to wake (AOD on), 2 days and a few hours of battery
It will hopefully get better with the new chip. From another article:
Not a direct comparison with the Exynos 9110 but it’s pretty likely it could hold a charge for at least a whole day for the uses cases you described if Qualcomm’s numbers are true.