• EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Which is also not rape. I’m not defending gaetz here, hes a fucking huge piece of trash. I’m just explaining to anyone who comes here why they aren’t using the term rape.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Once you trafficked the person across state lines, it can become a federal matter and the definitions of statutory rape, those of the federal definitions, not the ones in Florida. Or in either state, the one of origin or one of destination. this is because the rape charge can become an accessory charge to the trafficking charge. It all depends on the manner in which Gaetz is charged in these cases.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Can you direct me to the federal law that would make this rape?

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Depends on whether you’re talking about rape as a legal definition or a violation of a universal understanding of consent.

        It obviously doesn’t make sense that having sex with a 17 year old in one state isn’t rape when it would be in a different state, but that is the law. A bad one.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Doesn’t the fact that you recognize the law varies from state to state kind of disprove your claim of “universal understanding”?

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            1: Tell me more about how you want to fuck teenagers

            2: It’s very clearly a hypothetical being advanced to make the reader consider exactly that the belief isn’t universal

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I won’t lie. I see plenty of underage women that I find physically attractive. I find it hard to believe any man has never seen a minor that they find physically attractive. However, there are few I find intellectually or emotionally attractive… and precisely zero I would actually have sex with.

              I don’t see what that has to do with the law or your claim it’s universally accepted that having sex with someone under 18 is rape.

              I don’t follow point 2. The only way I can interpret it is that you are saying your point was actually the opposite of your point.

      • rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes, it fucking is. It’s very blatantly rape. Imagine being the guy who argues that trafficking a teenage girl to fuck her isn’t rape. You’re fucking disgusting and you definitely are defending Gaetz here. There’s no other reason to post this bullshit.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m explaining why they don’t use rape in the headline. If facts and reason while also thinking gaetz is pure scum is defending gaetz, well I can’t reason you out of a position you didn’t reason yourself into.