Oh, thanks for that link. They did go really deep into the numbers with this one. I knew the whole Starlink part of the letter made no sense given how the internet works, but I still had questions about the number of bullet ballots, which Snopes addresses as well state by state.
If there was anything to it, the Democrats would be talking about it. They have plenty of lawyers that can demand recounts in places where they suspect they could gain something. I know they’re generally incompetent, but not that incompetent.
Yup, same guy.
Lol, didn’t even notice it. I just started mentally putting ‘Republican’ in there by default.
deleted by creator
Funny, I always thought the war crimes were outrageous.
Yeah, I don’t understand how people can’t see exactly the type of guy he is within seconds of laying eyes on him. He’s not exactly an enigma, it’s all right there in front of you.
I personally wouldn’t mind algorithmic recommendations if:
Discovery is important when you’re initially signing up, but once you found the people you want to follow, you don’t really need it any more. It should just be there to help new users, essentially. As long as it’s open source and not run for profit, there’s not the traditional incentive to keep your eyeballs on the app like we see with the other networks.
Their other reporting’s been pretty shit as well.
Part of it is that they want to placate their “moderate” wing too (read: the donors). If your plan is Medicare for All, you can say that and it’s easy to explain to people. If your plan is the Affordable Care Act, you’ll still have the for profit death panels, so you’d have to say something like: ‘we’ll regulate the existing death panels slightly more and force you to sign up to them’, which doesn’t actually sound that great.
Trump definitely has nothing to do with Epstein not being alive any more…
This was all public knowledge, the DOJ just dropped the charges instead of prosecuting him because Merrick Garland is a useless piece of shit.
From what I read, only one Republican on the ethics committee needs to defect to the Dems side to be able to release the report.
I don’t know enough about any of the 5 members to guess if any of them are likely to want to break with Trump on this one.
Defense officials confirmed that the IDF is aware of the problem. They said that at one point, the government had even considered making the clans to which the armed men belong responsible for distributing aid to Gaza’s residents, even though some of the clans’ members are involved in terrorism, and some are even affiliated with extremist organizations like the Islamic State.
So source: the IDF
If you’re not even going to believe Israeli media…
Every private insurer has a death panel that is only accountable to share holders. Progressives need to start framing stuff in those terms instead of letting the Republicans bully them into accepting their framing.
Accuse Hamas of being Isis (after supporting them financially for decades), then turn around and support actual ISIS to aid in their genocide. Warms my heart to see the most moral army in action.
Yeah, I don’t think that’ll make a huge difference. The minute the US stops supplying, Ukraine’s in trouble.
Yeah, in a functional democracy he would be disqualified from running after Jan 6th. But of course, the US isn’t one of them.