• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 25th, 2023

help-circle



  • I agree. Apple should’ve known that this would eventually bite them in the ass. I’m actually surprised it’s taken this long.

    Apple should’ve made it so that consumers really prefer using the App Store and then open up iOS. Steam isn’t the biggest PC gaming platform because it forces people into it, but because it’s the oldest and most feature friendly. While side loading and third party stores are a thing on Android, most people use Google Play Store out of convenience unless the app is banned or priced too high.

    Apple will fight this tooth and nail because digital sales are their second biggest revenue stream and growing, more than Mac or iPad. But I don’t see them winning this long term, and once one country wins a suit against Apples closed garden of apps, the rest will follow if Apple doesn’t make worldwide changes.


  • This is why Apple devices ‘have such good resale value’, because Apple barely has sales.

    Windows laptops and Android get deep discounts for sales, making them cheaper to buy new, this resale is low.

    People will say the higher resale value is good for them when they want to sell their Apple product, but then thats negated by the fact that Apple has higher prices.


  • Context makes that comparison not surprising either, and also less impressive.

    The 13980hx is Intel 10nm, now called Intel 7, which is comparable to TSMC 7nm. The M3 is on TSMC N3B.

    Even the base M3 uses more transistors than the 13980hx. The M3 Max has more transistors than a 4090.

    So it’s essentially Apple buying their way to have a very good CPU. A similar chip is doable by Intel and AMD, but they have to build chips that partners want to buy, and the industry isn’t eager to have $1000+ SoCs that need to go into $3000 laptops, consumer demand for that is low.

    And mind you while the 13980hx is Intels highest performing mobile CPU, it’s not actually a mobile CPU, it’s a desktop CPU binned and power limited for mobile use. It’s a half ass take. After next year they will likely dump this approach as they are fundamentally changing their lineup.







  • They would need to completely revamp the branding if they want to market towards younger non-tech interested individuals. Simplify the hardware/software and boost marketing with a cool and luxury focus.

    That’s impossible, as Google cant control what people do with Android. If some OEM wants to make a $50 Android phone, they cant stop them.

    As you pointed out, Android still outsells Apple globally, but it should be obvious that most of those phones are budget devices, not flagships.

    Android will never be a premium brand, but there can be premium brands or lineups within Android. This is probably why Google completely killed the Nexus brand, which used to sell very cheap decent devices, now Pixel is more of a mid-high end brand.