• mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re trying to corporealize a concept that is fundamentally non-corporeal. An omnipotent being could make eternal suffering mean suffering eternally simply by virtue of being all-powerful. The means by which this is done is (would be) completely beyond our understanding or even able to be conceived by our current understanding of the world.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is exactly why it it’s so obvious that it was created by the minds of men. It doesn’t make sense to our understanding of the world/physics and the only argument anyone has comes down to “well if this all powerful God I can’t prove did exist he’d be able to do all of this in a way we can’t understand!”

      Sure, but anyone can theorize an all powerful omnipotent being and then make up whatever rules about them damning/saving you and the necessary conjecture about them being so beyond us that we can’t understand it.

      To me that’s just a shield against criticism, a red flag that the person making the argument is attempting to bring it into the realm of unfalsifiability. A very human tendency for a very human idea of god.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      … no, that’s your interpretation of what I said. I asked a straight forward question and you put your own spin on it.