I have both of those scanners and I consider them precision tools for different jobs. This year, I’ve scanned 10,000+ photos including print, slides, and negatives.

If you’re dealing with small format print photos, go with the FastFoto. Not only will it save you hundreds of hours, it has a wide variety of tools and settings you can tweak to get great results. Scanning using the flatbed will take you about 30 seconds to 1 minute per photo depending on how much you can pre-prepare with an assembly line setup. The Fastphoto can do 50 photos in that same amount of time depending on your settings.

I did not have any issues with damaging photos. I actually had photos damage the machine, if there was glue or an errant staple in the pile. But I managed to clean it off and repair it without issue.

A few years ago I scanned in a lot of family photos. I did it over a few months. I used a Canon flat bed that also has a negative adapter and slide adapter. I organized the files in multiple folders that were in a folder named the year (I estimated some). I scanned them at the highest resolution. Some where from the late 1800s. Keep the originals, my aunt and uncle threw some of their originals away! I asked if their hard disk dies what will they do? 🤦

I guess I can speak for this project since I have scanned in the last 11 months over 20K photos and negatives from my family dating back to 1906.

I chose the Epson v600 (I also use a v300 I also have) mostly because of the negative adapter that can scan up to ten 35mm negatives in one go. Also, my project was mostly 6x6 negatives and 35mm and only a small portion were prints (most photos were B&W and most 35mm were color).

One HUGE thing I missed in the first month or so was not taking advantage of the free SilverFast app that you can get the serial number directly from the publisher. Do not underestimate the quality of that app: as much as I hated it in the beginning (not intuitive, doesn’t “look” like a Mac app, etc.) but it is a very powerful app that will save you a tone of time “cleaning up” your photos. Lear how to use at least the basic functions of the app and you will save yourself a lot of time on Photoshop later.

I still have 3 more trips’ worth of photos I need to bring from my parents’ home overseas, but despite their initial reluctancy in having any interest over me placing those scanned photos on a Synology, they find themselves spending a lot of their time looking at photos that for the last many years have been in albums they seldom look. Now, they are just a couple of clicks or taps away from any of the photos.

Also make sure you catalog your photos while you scan them them, much easier to find what you’re looking for. I use the old method of naming as “YYYY_MM_DD Description of the photo or event”. Most of the photos were entire films or series of films from specific trips so my Photo albums also follow the same naming convention, making it simple to sort or find by date. Hope this helps and let me know if I can be of any assistance. It’s been an amazing project now toping my collection over 110K photos (not counting the last 10 years or so of phone and digital photos).

I very strongly recommend an auto-feed scanner! I have tried flatbeds, negative scanners and commercial services. Then I found a used Epson FastFoto FF-680W auto-feed scanner, and honestly, I would never go back! The quality is excellent and they are unbelievably fast! You will save SO much time!

If you’re scanning family-type photos the source quality is never perfect anyway. Much MUCH better to free up time for organizing, labeling, tagging etc all the photos — and to have time to actually watch them with family and friends.

Not once has a photo been damaged for me. But even if that would happen to 1% of the thousands of photos: so what? Better that you get them digitized in a reasonable amount of time, than that you treat them like unique collector’s items. In my experience, if you dont scan the, now, the likeleyhood of them beimg just lost or thrown away in the future is very high.

flatbed is best in my opinion, feeder is good for a few old photos, etc,…but cataloging many of them, and they possibly might be bent, etc flatbed is best

Auto feed.

I did this using an HP multifunction laser printer and it took forever. You can get apps that scan the whole area so you can do multiple photos at one time, still took forever.

Bit the bullet and bought a Fujitsu Scan Snap ix1600. It was expensive and soooooooo worth it. Pop a stack of photos in, hit the button, repeat. I banged out hundreds and hundreds of old photos that had been sitting around for years in a couple of weekends.

Now I am digitizing all my books with the same device.

If I had to do it all over again I might get the Brother version, but other than that? Auto feed all the way.

Not to hi-jack but in the middle of scanning my in-laws wedding book, celebrating their 50th anniversary. Any suggestions for colourization? Been using Photoshops Nueral Filters and it’s okay. Scanned in on Epson V600 with the highest detail I can so should have “some” pixels to play around with.