I think this decentralization and federation is what web3 is all about, without all the corporations calling everything to do with monkey pixel art that costs a million dollars “web3”

    • Matt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s been quite a lot of large companies and institutions on the Fediverse, mostly on Mastodon. As long as there are people there, corporate will follow too.

      Some examples:

      Then there’s all the big FOSS tech groups like KDE and Mozilla who are on the Fediverse too.

      As long as there’s an audience, people will come, just have to withstand the growing pains.

        • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s my concern - that some company buys up some of the most popular instances, then “encourages” their members to concentrate on just one instance, builds up the number of communities on it until it becomes totally dominant and then cuts out all the other instances.

          Not that the others couldn’t just continue, obviously, but if they’re starved of users they’ll be starved of content too and the gravitational pull of the big one(s) might drive the small ones into obscurity or closure.

          BRB, got a business idea…

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s exactly what Apple, Google, and Facebook did to XMPP. They all started with a federated open protocol messaging system. At first iChat users could talk to GChat, and Messenger users, as well as users of thousands of other servers. After they built their network they closed off federation under the guise of “feature development”.

            To this day, iMessage still uses an XMPP based backend. But green text is for Apple users only!

          • blackstampede@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Might seem naive, but I actually have a hard time imagining this. There’s just not a lot to make one instance more desirable than another, which seems like a bad thing, but I don’t think it is. I decided against signing up on lemmy.ml because it was laggy, so I went with a smaller instance- all the same content, but without the lag. If a lot of content gets created on one instance, there’s no pressure to pile in, because you can view, comment and interact from a different, smaller instance.