• caffinz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are 2640 2639 billionaires in the world. It may not be much when you think about it, but it’s a great start!

  • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    True Anon taught me to never, ever get into small passenger aircraft. Guess a new vehicle get added to that li-

    Tour firm OceanGate, which runs $250,000-a-seat expeditions to the wreck

    Yeah ok, never in my lifetime would I even het a chance lmao

  • Chup@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would be nice as journalist to be insistent on inquiring the duration of the dive so far.

    They write it’s missing, but it is obvious where it is.

    They write contact was lost, but it is unknown when. This seems to be the whole point of such a news. Was contact lost 4 hours ago or 4 days ago? Contact lost 4h ago would probably be all fine, as they mention the dive tour takes around 8 hours. 4 days ago would mean they are all dead, as oxygen lasts that long according to the article.

      • Dulce Maria@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it left on Sunday around 6am to start the 96 hr timer. Best case they lost power, dropped their load, and floated to the surface and are just bobbing around somewhere in the ocean.

    • johnyma22@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have a toilet behind a curtain. Imagine trying to hold poop for 3+ days… Imagine being the first one that poops and the odour… My eyes are stinging thinking about it…

  • shanghaibebop@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How does one even plan for contingencies? 96-hour life support, but can specialized rescue subs get there in time?

    • NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like a proper contingency in this scenario would be some sort of “instant death” system. Knowing you’re going to die, but waiting 96 hours for it to happen sounds terrible.

      • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get where you’re coming from but this sounds like an insanely bad idea. Perhaps I’d agree with you if there was something like cyanide pills people could opt to take, but even then I’m hesitant. There should be no way for one person (or some subset of people) to decide for everyone that now is the time to die; if someone wants to be in their head and push the limit and die at the last minute, that’s their call and theirs alone. Also, if there is some miraculous rescue but someone has pulled the “instant death” switch, they’ve effectively murdered the rest of the people.

    • HaphazardFinesse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been toying around with some design concepts for a DIY submarine for like a decade now. The first thing I thought about, right after “how do I control it going up/down” was “what do I do when that system fails, and I need to ascend in an emergency?” My thought was to have some scuba tanks attached to deployable salvage lift bags, so even if my ballasts were completely screwed, I could still ascend.

      If there’s not something analogous to that on board the Titan, I’d be shocked at their stupidity; It seems incredibly foolhardy to intentionally go somewhere that no rescue vehicle can recover you, without secondary and tertiary systems in place to rescue yourself.

      • TomHardy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        this concept is indeed unnecessary if you can’t even open your submarine yourself in the first place, another article says the bolts outside need to be oppened by a crew on the support ship

        • HaphazardFinesse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It could be mounted externally, separate from other systems, and it would be fairly trivial to implement a strictly mechanical means of activating it from inside the vessel. All that would be needed is to open the valve on the external pressure vessel.

          If you’re referring to getting out once you’re on the surface…hell of a lot easier for rescue crews to find you and do that if you’ve got a huge orange inflatable holding you at the surface, rather than however many thousands of feet underwater.

          • TomHardy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True. But I meant if all is only controlled from the inside, then what do you do if again that fails, seems like the same problem

  • Freeman@lemmy.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They may as well be on the moon.

    Curious if they are connected via a tether of some type.

    Either way, that’s not good and really sad.

  • purahna@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tour firm OceanGate, which runs $250,000-a-seat expeditions to the wreck,

    fucking mind-boggling