• Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Eu doesn’t have the weapons to replace the US, much less do anything more. All action by EU and European Nato is at best a political stunt to make US and Trump to change their minds.

    • Foni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      The European Union as a whole already spends more on defense than Russia or China, it is just a matter of coordinating spending by unifying efforts

        • Foni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Luckily that is a problem with a solution as simple as obvious

            • Foni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ok, my failure, I believed that if the problem was to spend your defense budget on US weapons, the option to spend it on non US weapons was evident. In any case, surely the French, Belgian, Spanish or British defense industry would be happy to have new clients

              • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                The issue with that is that the production of arms in the EU is next non-existent when compared to Russia and the US. Europe has been heavily de-industrialized and already has problems covering its energy budget. You can’t just throw money at that problem, because you don’t just need to rebuild factories, but infrastructure. Not to mention the brain-drain caused by academics moving to the US and China where actual research happens.

                • Foni@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I have not found data on arms production grouped by country, but I have found data on exports and this makes me doubt your statement. In any case, we do not have to face a war right now, considering R&D and industrialization as defense objectives could put us at the right level in perhaps a decade.

      • Korkki@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Money spent=/=production or productive capacity or performance.

        Everything in the west is just really fucking expensive, because defense industry is a racket meant to make profit not weapons.

          • wellfill@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Ok, lets take a look at the IISS table because the sipri only uses estimates for Russia. When you look at the source of the IISS table you get to a graph which shows that while for all other countries expenditure, the one for Russia and China have been ppp adjusted, meaning that the actual expenditure is different. The adjustment tells you what worth of goods you could buy from I’m assuming US market. Why the wiki table shows only these recalculated values for just Russia and China is beyond me. I also found an actually accessible article version of the FT https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/russias-2024-military-budget-exceeds-total-eu-defense-spending-ft/ar-AA1yWN0u To sum up the Russian expenditure DID exceed the european as in the FT, it only may be unclear what weapons they bought with it, but for the argument that EU outspends them, that is wrong.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        In the 3 years of the war we didn’t seen any creation of the military industry in Europe, instead we did seen deindustrialisation in key countries like Germany and UK. Also their so called ally, US, actively supress them with energy prices and actions like Nordstream sabotage. Even the country which military expenditure risen the most, Poland, just buy weapons in Occupied Korea, with barely any effort of sustainability other than forking money. And all that even before we talk about corruption and wastage in governments and military industries.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s a herculean task to create the sort of military industry Russia or US have. Aside from supply chains, there’s energy production, factories, workers, engineers that would be needed to spin up such industry. It’s a decades long process. Either European leaders have absolutely no clue how modern industry works or they’re just cynically lying to European public.