• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    We just made Quentin up, and that’s okay. It doesn’t mean stories like his aren’t potentially happening everywhere, constantly. Good journalism is about finding those stories, even when they don’t exist. It’s about asking the tough questions and ignoring the answers you don’t like, then offering misleading evidence in service of preordained editorial conclusions. In our case, endangering trans people is the lodestar that shapes our coverage. Frankly, if our work isn’t putting trans people further at risk of trauma and violence, we consider it a failure.

    I’m gonna laugh instead of cry

    Edit: lmao at the unibomber’s signature at the end

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      It is against free speech to stop us from fixating on the genitals.

      For more evidence of our time-honored journalistic commitment to endangering lives, please see our previous coverage of gay people, immigrants, Black people, and women.

      What if doctors are climbing through windows to suture penises to sleeping cheerleaders?

      All great journalists, and even those lesser journalists who don’t work for The Onion, eventually ponder why we do what we do. Is the point of reporting to illuminate the world around us, so that we may make meaning of it? Or is it to cause people in minority groups to question their humanity and persuade others to demonize them? We know where we stand, proudly dreaming of genitals.

      Fucking hell this is one of their best ones I’ve read 🤣

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        15 days ago

        They really outdid themselves. And if we’re all quoting our favorite parts…

        Much of the recent debate concerns medical procedures, particularly in children, and whether things like hormone replacement therapy or gender-affirming surgeries are safe and appropriate. Indeed, there are critical questions to be asked about the social complexities of gender, as well as medical ethics in a profit-driven healthcare system. We are simply not interested in any of that. Instead, we will use flawed data and spurious logic to repeatedly write the same hand-wringing arguments asking whether there are suddenly too many trans people around. Journalistic integrity demands nothing less.