• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Supporting the creators, yeah, because thats what Google built their empire on top of.

    Caring about people.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ads have started to straight up break the internet for me. I can go to websites and they’ll complain about my ad blocker, and the only help I get is “disable your extensions.” I don’t even have any extensions! No ad block! But sites still curl up and die on me.

    Is it because my browser is hardened? Is it Linux? Do I have to fork over private data to use a site and if I don’t they pretend the issue is ad blockers?

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        They might be referring to people who have it occur due to a technical problem (needing to clear their cache or something). Other than that, tons of my friends and coworkers have Premium and they’ve never complained of ads, so I don’t think it’s a normal thing that occurs frequently.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I believe they’re trying out different tiers of premium in certain regions (not the US). Lower tier premium has ads.

        • Aermis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Lol why are you getting down voted? Jeez lemmy users are sensitive about paying for an entertainment service.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            Youtube has been free for so long that people forget that hosting all those videos costs money. They’ll pay for so many streaming services but if you make Youtube anything but a free, ad-free paradise they lose it.

            • Aermis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              I guess. I never had nor will ever pay for premium, but isn’t there premium content? How’s that any different than paying for patreon videos of content creators? YouTube just consolidated it.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                There’s premium content, no ads, the creator gets paid significantly more for your Premium view, and bundled YouTube Music.

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Yea, and while I don’t use it you also get Youtube Music bundled in.

            • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Uhoh, the poor little baby corporation can’t handle hosting! Guess we will have to make the tools to self host then.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      IIRC that was specifically related to YouTube testing out a new Premium tier that allowed some ads, but also cost less, and only in specific markets.

      Not everywhere, and not regular Premium subscriptions, unlike how most posts try to make it sound, including yours. But don’t let the facts get in the way.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        IIRC that was specifically related to YouTube testing out a new Premium tier that allowed some ads, but also cost less, and only in specific markets.

        Not everywhere, and not regular Premium subscriptions

        …for now.

        Let’s keep that in mind.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Were they testing those ads on users that paid for an ad free premium or were they testing on users that bought a lower tier?

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Don’t know, the couple of articles I saw going around didn’t actually have any actual info in them, just the report by a random person in Germany which is one of the Premium Lite (or whatever they want to call it) regions.

          I don’t really care that much to be honest. I pay for YouTube Premium. My region doesn’t have a Lite option. I pay for several reasons, not just the lack of ads. I pay so the content creators I watch get paid more for my view. I pay for no ads. I pay for the bundled YouTube Music. All of those are part of my usage. The lack of ads is only one aspect. For others that may be different, and for them the price justification may be different as well if they’re only paying to remove ads.

          Not to mention that partial ad experiences at a lower cost are an inevitable middle option to regular ad and no-ad options. YouTube isn’t anywhere near the first to do this, and they definitely won’t be the last. Complaining about it will do absolutely nothing, they don’t give a shit and the only people that could force a change are shareholders, who only care about profits at this point. Customer satisfaction for a company like Google means fucking nothing.

          So why expend the energy? That can be focused elsewhere to much more effect.

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I will not use youtube and use ads. The sooner they break my adblocker, the sooner i won’t be on their platform

    • Aermis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I really don’t think they understand this… If an ad starts playing on YouTube I just turn it off and see why my ad blocker isn’t working. If it doesn’t work I simply don’t watch the video. I had no desire to switch to Firefox because Chrome was just working for me, but then it didn’t work. There’s no way in hell I’m sitting here with my adhd addled brain, with my 4 year old phone in my hands watching for 30 seconds why I need a brand new acura.

      The only time I’ve ever willingly watched an ad was tiktok. Because they know I can simply swipe and skip it, but sometimes the sponsored content is creative and entertaining.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        They do understand it. They just believe the number of people who will do it are small enough to be worth it.

        • Aermis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I guess. And you might be right. But the end goal of enshittifying everything is going to bottle out into unusable tech and the death of innovation.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          And sadly, they’re probably right. Just look at how many people are willing to sit there mindlessly absorbing messages from their corporate masters.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        You’re part of less than 10% of the people watching YouTube, and you’re in a 10% they won’t care about because you aren’t making them money anyhow.

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        google just made it so ad blockers using their engine will not work the same… probably why it was working fine then it didn’t

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ngl, I run Firefox and the usual suite of adblockers and haven’t experienced any issues. I do the same on my phone (Firefox in “desktop mode”).

  • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I didn’t use adblockers when they had occasional normal ad breaks. Now when I have to watch on a TV app its just a garbage experience.

  • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Google can suck the shit directly from my asshole Human Centipede style if they think I’m ever going to pay them for.not using their monopoly to harass me. When I can no longer feasibly block ads on YouTube, I’ll just move to another platform. Thank goodness they’re about to lose Chrome because otherwise they’d soon be injecting ads directly through the browser just like they do in their shitty news app.

  • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    YouTube is a monopoly. The reason no one really uses multiple platforms to upload videos at the same level as YouTube is because it was run for a long time at a loss to push out all competition. I have no simpthy.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Why paying for no longer having an ad free experience, if you can have a really ad free YouTube for free?

  • ngn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    i genuinely dont see why would anyone use the official youtube app/website to watch content at this point