• viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      According to the article, that so called university is teaching about healthy living, exercise, and how to make and handle money. On a surface level, that sounds pretty alright.

      Up until now when I researched the guy, I had no idea who he was and what ideals he represents. So I could see how unsuspecting people sign up for that stuff without any ill intent.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, that’s what the ad said, but the actual class was basically teaching how to trick a woman into bed. The movie sucked, by the way, even if the protagonist figures it out and leaves the class (happyish ending, I suppose). The original story is much worse and much more objectifying.

    • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Interesting that people find this surprising when it’s not surprising to me at all. This is the kind of people young men go to when they get chased away from more mainstream platforms.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        What do you mean by “chased away”?

        I think it’s a platform that they’re attracted to because they’re missing something in their lives.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fascinating that users find it interesting that people find it surprising when its actually is: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-65959097

        Andrew Tate charged with rape and human trafficking (21 June 2023)

        Controversial influencer Andrew Tate has been charged in Romania with rape, human trafficking and forming an organised crime group to sexually exploit women.

  • Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cool. Now use the data to get them all blacklisted on dating sites, that should reestablish some semblance of balance.

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Trump had one as well. Similar knuckle-dragging target audience between the two, I’d wager.

    • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Hustler’s University”

      I’m sure the intention is a play on Hustle culture and it’s supposed to teach you that grindset mindset, but it wasn’t too long ago that “Hustler” meant “con artist” and, well, it’s his university

      Surely that’s not what paragon of humanity and alleged sex trafficker Andrew Taint meant when naming it. He’s got the ego, but I’m not sure he’s clever enough to flaunt it

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    All this is very intriguing to say the least but I’m not sure I’m following the information correctly- have these users been doxxed or is this just a temporary blow to Tate’s pockets?

    • Kissaki@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not even a blow to his pocket if monthly pay continues. They modified the chat service, not their payment operations.

      If it’s only email addresses and chat logs I wouldn’t call it doxxing either.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Then I’m confused - sorry for being this slow- how is this supposed to affect him or his followers?

        • Kissaki@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          It’s bad publicity. A failure to protect their customer data and people may cancel due to it or evade them in the future. It’s also an opportunity to report on or discuss their other criticisms.

          I can’t speak for them; but it still seems like viable and productive activism to me, whether they do direct or indirect [monetary or personal] damage or not.