Found it very interesting. Compare it with any bourgeois president speech after some natural disaster.

Yeah, on that level, it seems hard to even compare. Based on what I can recall of US disaster relief, it seems that at its best, US take tends to be a lot of platitudes and maybe some funding thrown at the problem area. Whereas this is so very precise and scientific, addressing in detail the needs of people both as sympathy and substance, and looking toward the future to substantively prevent further problems. And not being afraid to publicly critique and correct issues in their own party thinking that can occur, w/ regards to disaster prevention, while also addressing unfair criticisms levied at them from outside. They are holding themselves accountable by being detailed about what they intend to do, which is something so absent in my experience with US “throw money or platitudes at things and/or make vague empty campaign promises before you have power” attitude. It’s a beautiful thing to see in action and sets an example for the scientific socialist approach of substance that is so important to communism.