• JASN_DE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    To be fair: an athlete holding the spear by the end and hurling it… somewhere by accelerating it through rotating the body like a hammer thrower does sound slightly dangerous.

    Also, the farthest throw was actually 104.8 meters.

      • JASN_DE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        98
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        True, but even the earliest commanders usually frowned on spears coming their way which were meant for the enemy.

        • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah… but it might have been a good tactic for the really shitty javelin-throwers, so they could make up in range what they lacked in accuracy.

      • StaticFalconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        Much like guns, so the Olympic sports of shooting has very little with most guns the average gun owner would have.

        • Plopp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is true. That’s why you rarely see hunters use the hammer throw spinning technique used in Olympic shooting.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    4 months ago

    the technique:

    using the technique holding the end of the javelin. Officials were so afraid of the out of control nature of the technique that the practice was banned through these rule specifications.

    • Waldowal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The javelin was officially redesigned in 1986 to limit its distance to keep it in the field, and to ensure it doesn’t land flat. They are likely only counting post-redesign throws.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        It was in 1956 though, why would they count post-redesign throws?

        It’s just a badly quoted fact.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Still the throw listed in the title is less than the one listed here. If it was broken before the change then it’s not the longest throw of the old generation as the title says.

  • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    …invented by American thrower Bud Held and developed and manufactured by his brother Dick…

    Are we… are we just ignoring the fact that the guy making these was named “dick held”?

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah the eighties! Most of these kids have never seen RotN… It’s pretty offensive so hasn’t been shown in decades.

  • z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    According to Wiki, the modern javelin event has an “unlimited runup”. I, for one, would like to test that wording of the rules

  • bdonvrA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    I vote for 200M exclusion circles where the Javelin throwers stand in the middle so they can throw using any method with no outside risk

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I say we bring back team sports - two or more groups throwing javelins at each other.

    It can be payed either turn based or in real time.

    … now that I think about it, with hammers & some body armour would be even better not as good but still fun.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      If we throw out the idea that the Games were meant to mark a cessation in hostilities, then let’s not go halfway.

      Get the SCA in there with their plastic armour and rattan swords and let’s have 1:1 and M:M combat. I want chariot races. I want simulated boarding actions from ‘ships’. I want a new colosseum built every 4 years and events 24/7 to a roaring crowd punctuated only by the sound of pneumatic t-shirt cannons. When they’re done, use them for death-row criminals in actual gear to fight for PPV for victim compensation. MORTAL COMBAAAAAAAT

          • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well obviously you rig them so you have someone survive and become popular, but you have to take them out before their 10th fight/race so they don’t earn their freedom.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      All sports would be better if they were full contact - especially golf. Hear me out.

      Everybody goes at the same time; you get points for speed instead of number of shots. You can an use your clubs to attack other players, so pads and a helmet are needed. You play in the summer. You’re caddy also brings water and Gatorade. Heat stroke/exhaustion is a DQ.

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The Revenge of the Nerds technique?

    Yeah, lots of movies from that era are problematic now. I’m not going to apologize for them, trivialize the problematic parts, or forget about them. All of those characters were gross parodies of stereotypes and that type of humor is no longer palatable to many people. But, this particular scene felt relatively devoid of any actual malice.

        • Wolf314159@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, lots of movies from that era are problematic now. I’m not going to apologize for them, trivialize the problematic parts, or forget about them. All of those characters were gross parodies of stereotypes and that type of humor is no longer palatable to many people. But, this particular scene felt relatively devoid of any actual malice.

            • Wolf314159@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Does it really? The whole group of main characters is a bunch of stereotypes, over the top affectations, and worn out tropes. This shows the group explicitly accepting Lamar for who they are and celebrating their accomplishments with a level of physical contact and intimacy that literally was making homophobes at the time cringe.