if that group obtained leadership and exercised power, it would split?
I meant more, if it clarified its direction and goal, it would split because it’s big enough and does enough different things (or is a vehicle for people to do different things) that people join it for all types of reasons whether that be tenant organizing or electing progressive democrats, so people would probably leave if the org stopped facilitating one or the other
Didn’t the post you’re replying to make the point that if that group obtained leadership and exercised power, it would split?
I meant more, if it clarified its direction and goal, it would split because it’s big enough and does enough different things (or is a vehicle for people to do different things) that people join it for all types of reasons whether that be tenant organizing or electing progressive democrats, so people would probably leave if the org stopped facilitating one or the other
Still true that it has a lot of potential
it really doesn’t have the centralization to do anything about that anyway. Its either the marxists taking over or the collaborators
You probably know more than I do, and I’d always prefer the Marxists lmao
nah dsa infighting is fuckin weird
like stalinists and trots are just two of the several factions that somehow don’t explode next to each other