Calling Murdoch “shadow director” is not “alarmist”. The reasons for this description of him is based on alarming facts. What would you call him based on these facts?

The example I gave from Insiders is what is alarmist, using lies. As is the example of ABC pretending Albo hijacked the DV rally whereas the full video, which ABC deliberately cropped, shows the truth.

I don’t recall such blatantly dishonest reporting from ABC before Murdoch infiltrated.