Colorado’s Democratic-controlled House on Sunday passed a bill that would ban the sale and transfer of semiautomatic firearms, a major step for the legislation after roughly the same bill was swiftly killed by Democrats last year.

The bill, which passed on a 35-27 vote, is now on its way to the Democratic-led state Senate. If it passes there, it could bring Colorado in line with 10 other states — including California, New York and Illinois — that have prohibitions on semiautomatic guns.

But even in a state plagued by some of the nation’s worst mass shootings, such legislation faces headwinds.

Colorado’s political history is purple, shifting blue only recently. The bill’s chances of success in the state Senate are lower than they were in the House, where Democrats have a 46-19 majority and a bigger far-left flank. Gov. Jared Polis, also a Democrat, has indicated his wariness over such a ban.

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are we reading the same link?

    A person in violation of the prohibitions will be assessed a first-time penalty of $250,000 and $500,000 for each subsequent violation.

      • Talaraine@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I read the link you posted, and is the summary of the actual text of the bill inaccurate? Not even trying to argue.

        • BlackRing@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m more concerned that something that important is only in the summary. Either I don’t understand how bills are written, granted in a state I don’t live in, or the text was changed but the summary not?

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Either it is, or the bill was amended and one of the two is out of date.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It might refer out to an already existing class of punishment. I will admit I don’t have the time to read it right now to see if that’s the case. I am severely disappointed though if it’s not actually all semi-auto weapons. Trying to divide military from civilian semi-auto rifles is ridiculous.